5 Best Golf Chippers (I’ve Tested Every One)

Photo of author

By Jon Webber

Share Your Thoughts

Blog Post Horizontal 15

We all know what it’s like to lack confidence with the wedges. It’s one of the easiest ways to put up some pretty high scores, and because of this, chipper clubs have become popular. Today, we’ll be comparing a number of different models and trying to find which one is king.

An Overview: Our Favorite Golf Chippers

Click one of the links below to be taken to the section where we give an in-depth summary and list the pros and cons of each chipper.

You can also click here to skip to the section where we actually test each chipper on the course.

Our Favorite Chipper: Ping ChipR

ping chipr 1
  • Cost: $179
  • Milled face
  • 35 inches long (but can be custom-fitted)
  • 38.5 degree loft
  • Extra long grip
  • Cambered sole designed for smooth contact with ground and grass

Ping has been making premium clubs for a long time and that’s still the case with their ChipR. Compared to every chipper I’ve tested, this one felt and performed the best.

It’s the most expensive option on the market, which will put some people off. Even for me, it was tough to spend that much money for a club that might only be used a few times per round.

What I like about this chipper is that it’s similar to a traditional iron and wedge. A lot of the other chippers look and feel very different, so they can take some time to get used to.

The ChipR has the same loft as a 9 iron and is the same length as a putter. With this loft, you can still get the ball in the air and you can also lean the shaft forward to hit a lower bump-and-run.

Runner-Up: Cleveland Smart Sole

cleveland smart sole chipper 2
  • Cost: $139
  • Milled face
  • 35 inches long
  • 42 degree loft
  • Full-face grooves
  • Extra wide three-tiered sole

I wasn’t able to test this chipper initially when I was making this post, but it’s one of the best. A friend of mine got one recently, so I was able to try it out for a round.

What I like about it is that it’s cheaper than the Ping. It also comes in more loft options. Cleveland make some of my favorite wedges and the Smart Sole carries the same quality.

The chipper model has more loft than the Ping, which will be good if you want to chip the ball higher. For some people, this can be a bit easier.

What I don’t like as much is that the Smart Sole chipper is pretty wide. It’s much more “chipper” like compared to the Ping. If you’re someone who really struggles with their short-game, trying something completely different could be the way to go.

Budget Pick: Wilson Harmonized

wilson harmonized chipper
  • Cost: $60
  • 35 inches long
  • 32 degree loft
  • Good alignment aid on top of club

If you’re looking for a budget option or you want to test a chipper to see if you’ll actually like it, this is probably the one to go with.

One thing to note about this chipper is that the loft is pretty low. This means that it’s going to be ideal for bump and run shots, not chipping the ball over something (or any shot needing height).

It’s definitely not as premium looking/feeling as the Ping and Cleveland. It’s even more “chipper” like, but it has good alignment aid on it and it does its job pretty well.

  • Where To Get: Check the price on Amazon

One To Consider: Odyssey X-Act

odyssey xact chipper
  • Cost: $130
  • 35.5 inches long
  • 37 degree loft
  • Oversized non-taper extra-long grip
  • Urethane insert – giving “ultimate feel and control”
  • Hybrid-like sole

If you want a premium club that really looks like a chipper, this is one you should check out. It comes with an oversized grip that makes it feel like a putter. Take a normal putting stroke and the ball with pop up.

What I like about this chipper is that it’s probably the easiest to align and start the ball on target. Pick your line, align your club, and take a putter stroke.

The bottom of this chipper is quite large and flat, so it doesn’t feel like your standard wedge. If you hit a lot of fat/thin shots around the green, you shouldn’t have that problem with this one.

  • Where To Buy: Check the price on Amazon

Probably Not Recommended: Mazel Wedge

mazel chipper
  • Cost: $48
  • 35 inches long
  • Lofts of 35, 45, 55 and 60 degrees
  • Milled face – rather than cast or urethane
  • “High-performance” rubber grip
  • Extra-wide sole

This was another budget-friendly option that’s similar to the Ping but comes in more lofts. That’s the main benefit to this wedge.

In terms of quality and performance, this one was the worst. The Ping, Cleveland, and Wilson seemed to be more durable. They also gave me more consistent results.

That’s not to say you’d get the same results. You could get the Mazel and Wilson chipper to try out, for less than the Ping or Cleveland. Could be something to consider.

  • Where To Buy: Check the price on Amazon

How We Tested The Chippers

Even Tiger Woods has occasionally struggled with chip shots. There’s no shame in it, if one of the world’s greatest golfers has had wedge shot woes. Most of us though don’t have access to the world’s best coaches and the ability to spend hours around a practice green.

That’s why chippers have become so popular among mid and high handicappers. And even a few professionals. But which club is the champion of the chippers?

I’ve owned four of them over the past two years and I’ve used them extensively, comparing them against my wedges and also 8 and 9 irons. Included in the four is the new Ping ChipR … and I also managed to get hold of a Ping ChipO from the 1970s for a five-chipper challenge.

The first one I owned was a Wilson Harmonized chipper. I loved that club. It really helped me get close to the flag from up to 50 yards out, as long as I had no obstacles – bunkers or water – to get over.

Sadly, after a year of (extensive!) use, the head fell off! That was mid-shot and highly embarrassing! It was beyond repair. I will say though that the new Wilson chippers look much more sturdy than their predecessor.

Note: I wasn’t able to test the Cleveland chipper initially so it’s not included in the test. I tested it after tha fact and it performed really well, probably the second best.

Space Odyssey

s l1600 1

So I then tried the Odyssey X-Act (pronounced Exact), which I kept for more than a year but just couldn’t get on with – or so I thought. That’s not to say of course that the club wouldn’t work for you.

It’s a brilliant design and is incredibly well made, as you’d expect from Odyssey. It just didn’t work for me. I found it harder to judge distances, especially from a longer range. We’ll look at some test results in a minute.

The grip – which is designed to keep your hands and wrists quiet – looks like a putter grip to my untrained eye. USGA rules state that you can’t use a putter grip on any club other than – a putter.

However, I spoke to Odyssey – which is part of Callaway Golf. Callaway’s PGA professional, Kevin Conlong, told me: “Regarding the grip, this is a round grip and not a putter grip.”

That’s great news and worth knowing if you’re in a competition and one of your opponents says: “That’s not legal because it’s got a putter grip.” You can assure them that it absolutely is legal! And better still, hopefully, you’ll hole a couple of shots from around the green just to rub it in.

Moral Mazel

For me though, after months of struggling with that club, I saw videos for the Square Strike wedges. I did some research and many reviewers said Mazel wedges were very similar but much cheaper. I opted for the Mazel with 45 degrees of loft and used it a lot. But again, it just didn’t work for me.

Ping ChipR

Blog Post Horizontal 16

Then Ping announced they were bringing out a chipper! Is this the game changer I’ve been looking for, to stop me from being a chipping chump? Will it match the success I had with that Wilson Harmonized chipper of two years ago?

Quality Of The Clubs

All clubs are well made but the Ping and the Odyssey feel like premium products. They should do because they’re more expensive, but they will last you for years and years.

Having said that, neither comes with a head cover, whereas the Mazel does. And because of the size of the heads, particularly the Odyssey, I think you need a cover to stop damage to your other clubs.

But let’s not get into the debate about head covers for irons and wedges!

Top 3 Chippers Put To The Test

I still owned the X-Act and Mazel so I thought I’d put them to the test. On a bright sunny day in the UK, I headed to the practice ground at my club for the ultimate challenge: which is the champion chipper?

I hit balls from 10 yards, 15 yards, 20 yards and 30 yards to the flag – with no obstacles in the way.

It’s worth noting first that this is how they performed for me. Chipping is what I find the hardest on the course. I’ve worked hard on that side of my game but I can’t chip as well as I can use longer clubs and my putter.

I’d rather be 100 yards out than 30. Any shot that needs a shorter or less powerful swing seems to faze me. I think this is probably the case for a bunch of weekend hackers.

That said, you might feel a bit different after using them. Therefore, which club works best for me might not be best for you. My advice would be to try them if you’re struggling with chipping and need help.

10 Yards Out

10-YARD CHALLENGENear flag
Odyssey X-Act 5/10 within a putter length
Mazel WedgeNone within a putter length
Ping ChipR7/10 within a putter length

Well firstly, from 10 yards to the flag, none of them worked as well as my putter. From such a short distance, and with no obstacles to get over, I’d use that every time!

And the results with my putter were what I’d expected. In testing, using ten balls, one went in the hole and the other nine were all within a putter length of the hole. I did that test again and all 10 were within a putter length. 

The Ping ChipR was the next best performer – seven out of 10 went within a putter length of the flag. The other three were fairly close.

The X-Act was the next-best performer with five within a putter length and the rest were also close.

It’s almost best not to talk about my results with the Mazel. Not one went near the flag. I’ve written the word “awful” in my notes. I mean – I was awful, not the club! 

Again, you may have a totally different result here. I opted for the 45-degree loft with the Mazel and that is just too much for me for such a short shot. I can’t generate enough speed to get the ball in the air from that distance. So why not just use … a putter. A 35-degree Mazel may have been better for me.

15 Yards Out

15-YARD CHALLENGEOn the greenNear flag
Odyssey X-Act20 out of 20 4 within a putter length
Mazel Wedge20 out of 206 within a putter length
Ping ChipR20 out of 205 within a putter length

From 15 yards, over some rough terrain but from a tight lie with very short grass, I decided the putter wouldn’t work. I used 20 balls with this test.

With the X-Act, all 20 got onto the green (you’d hope so from such a short range but I can miss even from there!). Two of the balls hit the flag – and I do think the lining-up system on the X-Act is excellent. Only four ended up within a putter length of the pin though.

IMG 2356
Odyssey within 15 yards

The Mazel performed better for me from this distance than from 10 yards. All 20 balls were on the green and six were within a putter length of the flag, giving me a good chance of getting “up and down.”

The Ping ChipR was very similar – all 20 on the green and five within a putter length. 

But 15 yards shouldn’t be too difficult. So let’s get a bit further out and see how the clubs performed. I had a good lie from 20 yards out – ie with a lot of grass under the ball.

20 Yards Out

20-YARD CHALLENGEOn the greenNear flagIn the hole
Odyssey X-Act18 out of 20 4 within a putter lengthNone
Mazel Wedge17 out of 20None within a putter lengthOne in the hole! 
Ping ChipR20 out of 204 within a putter lengthNone

For me, the Ping wins it here. I’m confident that I can two-putt most of the time if I can just get the ball anywhere on the dance floor. So that is the most important thing for me. And the Ping gets 100 percent here. I tested the Ping twice just to see if the first was luck. The second time, all 20 also got on the green.

The X-Act did really well – much better than I thought it would.

Despite the hole-in-one with the Mazel, it just didn’t work for me. And that is pretty much what happened with it during 18 holes of golf.

But let’s make this harder. Let’s move out to 30 yards. Again from a good lie.

30 Yards Out

30-YARD CHALLENGEOn the greenNear flagIn the hole
Odyssey X-Act13 out of 20NoneNone
Mazel Wedge12 out of 201 within a putter lengthOne in the hole!
Ping ChipR20 out 202 within a putter lengthNone

With the X-Act, I wrote in my notes: “It felt hard to generate enough power to get that far which led to inconsistent strikes.”

Again, this club may work really well for you, so try it out. But for me, it didn’t work as well as I’d liked. I had another hole-in-one with the Mazel but too many missed the green.

IMG 2357
Mazel within 30 yards

The Ping though – wow!

Again I redid that test because it started to rain when I first got the Ping out of my bag (well this is the UK). The results were the same in the second test – all 20 on the green.

I’d hate to count the times I’ve been 30 yards from a green off the tee on a par 4 and walked off with a 6! Getting down in three shots from there is what I want and I feel the Ping will help me do that. Yes with the Mazel, I might have an eagle occasionally, based on these results. But I’d miss eight greens out of 20 too.

The Best Golf Chipper

ping chipr 7

For me here, the Ping ChipR is the clear winner when you factor in quality and performance. If you consider the value, the Cleveland is tough to beat.

Off the back of this test, the Odyssey and the Mazel went onto eBay a few days later and the Ping has stayed in my bag.

Whether or not I’ll be keeping it long-term is hard to say. But I like it and it’s a good go-to club, especially on days when your confidence around the green is low.

I got the Mazel in a sale and made £10 profit on it. I lost £10 on the Odyssey, after a year of use, but had a huge amount of interest in the club. It’s very clear that these clubs are hugely popular and sought-after. So if you do want to buy several to try, hopefully, you wouldn’t lose too much money. 

Despite holing out those two shots with the Mazel, the Odyssey would have been my second choice (before testing the Cleveland) and I might have kept it were it not for the Ping ChipR.

The Odyssey certainly works really well for me within 20 yards but the Ping is more consistent and better – for me – from further out.

If you struggle with alignment, then the Odyssey is possibly the best club for you because its “Marxman Alignment System” is excellent. That’s not the problem I have with chipping so it’s less valuable to me.

Also, because of the wide sole of the club, it’s almost impossible to fat a shot – ie dig into the turf before you hit the ball. That may be of huge benefit to some people too.

Of course, what works for you may be totally different. Therefore, I would repeat my advice – try out a few of these clubs. If you can afford to buy a few and test them out over several weeks, even better!

Let’s Hear From You

Have you used any of these chippers? Is there another one that you really like? Let us know in the comments and you’ll be entered into our gear giveaway.


What To Do Next:

Enter Our Gear Giveaway: Like free golf stuff? A few times per year, we pick a few of our viewers and send them some gifts. Click here to learn more.

Deals & Discounts: We’ve worked with brands to offer discounts to our readers. See our deals and discounts page to see our current promotions.

Write For Us: Calling all hackers, whackers, and golf enthusiasts. Out Of Bounds Golf is looking for writers. If you’d like to get paid to write about golf, click here for more info.

Jon is the main product tester at Out Of Bounds Golf and has been in the golf world for 10+ years. He has personally tested over 100 products, from balls to clubs to bags. He started this website for the average player, to help make the game a little easier to understand.

guest
3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments